seoul food for people who love to eat
There’s been quite a bit of controversy in the Korean expat blogosphere about bad service, particularly at Western restaurants in Seoul. Zen Kimchi has taken some swings at Itaewon favorites, while both the Metropolitician and Expat Jane have something to say about another venerable institution of the foreigner enclave. So what gives? Is service in Seoul doomed to be less than stellar?
James Watson’s illuminating book, Golden Arches East: McDonald’s in East Asia, examines the spread of the fast food chain throughout Asia, and Sangmee Bak’s contribution, McDonald’s in Seoul: Food Choices, Identity, and Nationalism, touches on something pertinent. Mainly, what customers think they’re paying for when they go out to eat isn’t consistent across cultures. Sure, everybody who forks over their hard earned cash for a meal somebody else has cooked knows they’re paying for the food. But what else is your money paying for?
Foreigners, particularly Westerners, think of cost of their meal as including the food first, and ambiance and service as secondary but important points. One reason McD’s or Lotteria costs less than Ape with Pipe, we reason, is that we’re not getting waited on when we eat fast food. Any place we sit down to enjoy our meal, the cost of having our plates plated and our places set costs more – and rightly so. After all, we’re paying for the service. This line of reasoning holds even in countries where people give gratuities to wait staff. In America, for example, servers are paid less than the legal minimum wage with the expectation that they’ll make up the difference in tips from patrons (anyone who doesn’t must be paid the difference by the restaurant that employs them.) So on top of whatever portion of your bill went towards service, you pay another 10-20% depending on the area and the quality of service you feel you got. North Americans especially have a complex set of social rules and etiquette that govern tipping, and not tipping or tipping poorly is seen as poor manners.
Korea works a little differently. Here, servers are paid a basic wage, and no tipping is expected (just try it sometime and enjoy the confused look your server will give you!) Some upscale hotels and restaurants will add a service charge, but this isn’t the same as the gratuity you would pay directly to your wait staff in another country. Servers here are wage employees only. That said, the service industry in Korea is low on the totem pole. Waiting tables is a very low prestige and low paying job (figure that if he’s lucky, the average worker at Lotteria is earning just over 2000 won per hour.) The people who do this work, even at a fancy restaurant or hotel, aren’t being given much respect by the patrons. This isn’t Europe, where working as a waiter can be seen as a perfectly legit job – this is Korea, and it’s one step above DDD work. And without tips, there’s not much incentive to improve the quality of their service. “After all,” reasons your server quite logically, “they already look down on me, and they’re not giving me incentive, financial or otherwise, to simper and cater to their crazy whims.”
The other larger issue at hand is that the Korean customer isn’t placing a priority on service. That’s not what their hard-earned won is going for. For Koreans, the physical space they occupy in a restaurant or cafe is nearly as important as the actual food and drink they imbibe. Space in Seoul is at a premium, and Seoulites are willing to pay beau coup bucks for it. That’s why a cafe in Samcheong-dong or Apkujeong can get away with charging 8000 won for a glass of watered-down coffee and ice: the coffee costs the customer 3000 won, and the rest is so the customer can park their butt in a comfy chair by some nice scenery for the next four hours. Small, cramped living spaces mean that Koreans don’t entertain much at home, so meeting friends and associates in restaurants, bars, and cafes is much more important. Cooking oil greases the wheels of society.
Bak’s article recalls the time when McDonald’s was new to Korea. Ah, back in the day when there wasn’t an 오곡 (ogok: five grain) shake to be had! Nowadays Mickey D’s is a shining example of successful integration into the Korean fast food scene, but in the beginnings were troubled times. Cash was flowing out, but not back in and it was all because of those pesky kids! And college students. And office workers. And pretty much every patron who came in the door.
You see, long ago Korean people weren’t yet trained in the ways of the fast food warrior, and they thought you could just come into McDonald’s and sit for hours chatting with your friends as you linger over fries. Because to Koreans, the 500원 ice cream cone wasn’t just money for ice cream, but a ticket to a place to sit and hang out. Which they did. But McDonald’s revenues depend on fast turnover, and every customer taking up space is costing the corporate headquarters moola. Something had to be done!
Back in the day, McDonald’s had to hire young women to act as greeters – but the job description didn’t end there. According to Bak, a major part of the womens’ role was to subtly (or overtly) pressure customers to get the hell out of Dodge by standing behind them, pointedly asking them if everything was ok, and even seating customers at tables that were already occupied. Koreans eventually learned different eating behaviors for fast food restaurants, but at the time it was a major battle with the future profitability of the company at stake! The idea of eat-and-run in any place that wasn’t serving off the streets is a relatively new one.
Even now, Koreans conceptualize their bill as not just a payment for food, but also for time and space. Service is way down on that list.
FatMan doesn’t think we should all just sit around and accept bad service. Indeed, just like McDonald’s retrained people to eat and give up their seat, so can patrons of all backgrounds train restaurants in the benefits of good service. By insisting on good service, and bringing it to managements attention that we think it’s part of the deal (and that servers are worth the investment) things will start to change for the better. In the meantime, service isn’t yet . . .well, “service”.
우리 FatManSeoul는 이러한 이유로 한국의 최고의 음식에 대한 최고의 리뷰와 비평을 공유하고 싶습니다. FatManSeoul는 평범한 음식에서부터 고급음식까지, 강남지역 최고급 레스토랑에서부터 시골 할머니의 집에서 맛볼 수 있는 정이 깃든 찌게까지 모든 음식을 리뷰 대상으로 삼고 있습니다. 우리는 특별한 음식을 찾아 블로그를 통해 전세계에 소개할 것입니다. 또한 음식에 대한 가장 정확한 정보를 리뷰, 레시피, 인터뷰, 팟캐스트, 교재 등을 통해 제공할 것입니다. 이 모든 컨텐츠는 한국어와 영어로 제공될 것입니다. FatManSeoul is Korea's first bilingual online magazine about food. We’re committed to searching high and lo, from the poshest cuisine of Kangnam to the most humble, jeong-laden jjigae of the halmoni-jip in the countryside for the best food in the country. Come here for reviews, recipes, interviews, podcasts, tutorials, and the best, most accurate information on ingredients and methods, in Korean and in English. 같이 먹자!
impolite one
August 30th, 2008 at 5:17 am
A good topic here, as this is something that permeates restaurant/cafe culture in Korea. I am merely a patron at these places, but it still burns me up to see Koreans lingering at fast-food joints, or sharing single-dish ‘cheap’ items betwen two or more people, slicing the restaurant revenue in half, and having the nerve to take their time. I suppose that is the wannabe restaurateur in me getting mad.
As time marches on, what will most likely happen, in my view, is that restaurants and fast-turnover cafes will have to set a time limit on seats, as is the case with most places in urban Japan. 2 hours seems to be the maximum there, and people comply with that voluntarily. Partially because it reflects on their own manners, and partially because the Japanese have been abroad enough to know that it paints a picture on their whole society when stuff like this happens. I imagine that when Korea does it, it will probably be first implemented in Myongdong on the weekends. The reality of real estate/turnover. Most of those places in Myongdong can’t make any money for this very reason, so they all eventually end up shuttering.
In Korea, the current and past scenario has been to stand at a busy coffeeshop holding your freshly ordered drink, while a roomful of people sitting in couches with no drinks study, loiter, and give you really dirty looks. One really needs to brace themselves for a fight if they think they’re gonna get a seat in one of those Cafe Pascucci’s or the coffeeshops in COEX?
The other way that shops have tried to combat this is to offer the ‘couple/family sets’ that include a main dish and then a secondary high-margin item that is supposed to fill the need for a full-size 2nd dish, intended for sharing between 2 people and stopping the washout of revenue that happens when people share a single-person dish, but I don’t think this is effective enough. It’s just another menu option with set choices that aren’t as attractive, and they have to slash the prices on them to make them attractive.
fatmanseoul
August 30th, 2008 at 10:47 am
Fatman doesn’t have a problem with Korean people sitting for a few hours over a single menu item, or splitting something larger . . . it’s part of the culture here, and in a place where you can’t really socialize at home, these cafes and restaurants fulfill an important social role also. Moreover, most of these places know the place they hold – it was only with the entry of McDonalds into the Korean market that it became an issue. McDonalds, unlike the local scene, depended on high turnover to make their profits, and Fatman actually really admires the way in which they were able to turn to local culture to find a solution that fit. Of course, now Koreans understand expectations, and the company has managed to be both successful and culturally flexible. That’s pretty darned cool. Another fascinating adaptation is these couple sets – since Koreans tend to eat out to socialize, not because they want to consume an entire double bacon cheeseburger with fries and appetizer and soda, things like couple sets and shared meals have become something that the market has decided to cater to instead of fight. Fatman can’t see TGIF going out of business anytime soon just because five teenage girls go in there and split a bunch of appetizers. And just for comparison, while the American Bennigans has gone bankrupt, Bennigans Korea is still going gangbusters.
Fatman can’t see Korea enforcing any kind of time limit on sitting. Restaurants go out of business regularly in Myeongdong because the rents are sky high, not because Koreans take their time over their cup of joe.
In the meantime, lots of places don’t bother making people move on and seem to be plenty successful. Most places seem to know the needs of the market well, and have either found culturally appropriate ways of encouraging the table time they require, or by altering their own market strategy to accommodate the local style.
Fatman doesn’t think we should put up with bad service, but ain’t nobody gonna pry us out of our comfy Coffee Bean couch before closing ^_^